Could Lee Be Moved?

    This is all speculation of course, as David Murphy haughtily noted earlier this week. It is interesting to note, however, that John Heyman recently reported that Texas is a team that is NOT on Cliff Lee’s 21-team no-trade list. Texas, of course, is in first place and has missed winning the World Series two years in a row. I would imagine that would make them serious about winning one this year, and serious about making a trade to improve their team. Cliff Lee has had a disappointing season so far, especially for his salary. It is important not to make rash decisions and trade someone who still has great stuff and is coming off a very, very good year.

That being said, Texas has two great infield prospects (yes, just prospects) at third and short. Against, this is purely hypothetical, but it may be worth considering trading Lee, keeping Hamels, and  getting much younger (and probably better) at third base with Mike Olt. Yes, he is in AA, but having a great year and is a highly-touted prospect. I would find it hard to believe he could not give just as much production at third than Polanco, if not more. The Rangers also have a big-time SS prospect in Jurickson Profar. Being very young (just 19 and in AA) I would not see him starting in the bigs next year or even on the bench. But as we know, Jimmy is not getting any younger, so it would be nice to have someone in AAA who could eventually take the reigns. And I haven’t forgotten about Galvis, but his bat is still suspect, and he has shown he can be a possible successor to Utley.

   I am not the RAJ, so there is no pressure on me to throw these scenarios around and make fantasy trades. Also, I am working under the assumption that Texas would want Lee. I really don’t know, either, if Texas would trade those two for Lee, or if the Phillies would want more than that. I’m just a caveman. What I do know is that, RAJ has to be creative this year/off-season in order to stay competitive and rebuild a bit at the same time. Trading Lee should be on the table.

This entry was posted by theyellowseats.

3 thoughts on “Could Lee Be Moved?

  1. Continuing our text discussion from earlier:

    When teams eat salary to move a player, it is generally for relatively short periods of time. Paying large chunks of Lee’s salary would do little to help them free up cash for a large contract to Hamels, and the would be

    The value of those two prospects far exceeds the small marginal increase in probability of the Rangers wining the WS.

    • I didn’t necessarily say “large chunks” but it could help. And the Phillies paid part of Thome’s salary for a few years. You are also assuming that the two prospects are going to increase in value (in text conversation). They are in AA, and I think we all know prospects are just that. Lee is an established Cy Young winner and All-Star. Remember when Dom Brown was tearing up AA and was RAJ’s untouchable? A lot can happen between AA and the bigs. Look at what the Phillies traded for Halladay (obviously Lee is not Halladay): their top pitching prospect, their top catching prospect, and a very promising outfield prospect. I don’t think what I proposed is as unrealistic as you think.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: